FILAMENTS AND SUPERVOIDS

Following up on the topic of harmonic galactic inclinations and harmonic axis of rotations where we explain why we predict many structures of our universe will show similar vectors of angular momentum there will also be exceptions.

Some exceptions could be the results of secondary collisions and secondary mergers. Because the distance away determines the age we may find that objects in certain age brackets share similar harmony and the newer objects show a greater percentage of secondary impacts.

But there is also the exceptions to the initial impacts. Most would share the same trajectory and result in similar resulting transfers of angular momentum but some could be more head on and some could collide hitting the backsides of objects causing a reverse spin. Odd ball galaxies that don't fit the general scheme of their host cluster may be due to secondary collisions or could be based on the angle of impact of the initial impact clipping the backsides of those two objects.

Areas of our Post that we label SuperVoids , huge vast areas without significant massenergy cohesion to the localized tensor mesh and nearly void of any significant matter would be those areas that had the least number of collisions or no collisions at all. Those areas we list as superclusters or filaments could be where collisions took place that were more head on.

When two separate frames of reference collide there can be some number of objects that do not collide at the same relative angle of impact because inside their own frame of reference their orbital velocity was significant enough to see two objects collide at a more perpendicular angle to the general trajectory of the two pockets.

This would result in a different manifestation of the resulting energy clouds. There would be less conversion of linear momentum into angular momentum and a greater output of heat and energy. Those clouds would cool to see less eddies of spinning mass form from eddies of spinning energy. The fact that some of the largest structures in our visible universe are filament like superclusters of galaxies that share a fairly similar frame of reference (per filament) that have a much lower or unmeasurable speed of rotation indicate those collisions resulted in less angular momentum and more energy involved in those collisions resulted in more resulting matter once it cooled.

Supervoids at the initial time of impact were those areas where no collisions took place or minimal collisions like asteroids or moons scattered about randomly but this would be expected if there were collisions of massively dense objects that the preexisting distance between them would have a random variety of distances apart that that is why our local pocket of space time is not quite isotropic or homogenous.

So the fact that we have supervoids and superclusters I feel would make sense if the natural state of nature that produced what we see today was caused by successive collisions of celestial objects colliding at faster than light relative speeds usually making contact at the same relative angles of impact but occasionally hitting head on and converting immense amounts of kinetic energy into more matter than the pockets of hot energy caused by non-head-on collisions.

The largest voids we can see pale in comparison to the expanse outside our Post. To reduce redundancy I coined the acronym "post" to stand for pocket of space time. Each nested frame of reference is a post and using Post with a capital P I would equate to the single largest measurable cohesive pocket of relative space-time mass-energy that we share. Porstme does not sound as nice as Post and so our Post would be all the matter contained inside the boundaries between our known universe and the expanse. The expanse is the supervoid between Posts. I feel that we likely will find a very general rule of thumb. And when I say that we may find, its not something that humans will find. It is something that should we be so lucky to evolve to a type V civilization , it could be something that species someday might be able to measure. And what I predict as a general rule of thumb is that the voids between objects "On Average" are proportional to the size of the objects at that scale.

If we looked at all the orbits of all the planets we can see someday we will find that on average the distance between them is proportional to their size. It would make sense because they coalesced to pick up all that matter that was in between the orbits as they formed . Farther out would be larger orbits so more matter to accumulate and thus more distance between them. And likewise the space between galaxies on average is proportional to the size of the galaxies and thus the space between Posts will be proportional to the size of the posts. There will be Many exceptions to this general rule of thumb! (That is why I don't claim this to be any type of law but someday it would certainly be interesting to see how Boyle's law does play out across different cosmic structures. )

And that holds true as you go further and further up at each success parent frame of reference those collections of objects sharing the same relative trajectory and velocity will form cohesive pockets with empty space between them that on average are proportional to the size of the posts at that scale. But something seems to break that rule inside the atomic nucleus. The strong force would seem to defy that general rule of thumb and the quarks appear to be more closely and tightly packed together than the general rule of thumb but that is what we would predict if the mass energy density is higher than average. So then there would be I feel some correlation we find someday to the empty space between orbits that is tied to a comparison of their relative size and the mass energy density of the parent pocket of space time.

Forbes 06/16/2021 New-astronomical-discovery-challenges-500-year-old-copernican-principle

bigthink.com/hard-science/large-scale-structures

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_cosmic_structures

bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/the-largest-structures-in-the-universe-may-not-actually-exist

#supercluster #superclusters #supervoids #bootesvoid

#harmonicgalacticinclinations #harmonicgalacticaxisofrotations #BIGBANG #thebigbang #successivecollisiontheory

#thenaturalstateofnature

LIVE LONG AND PROSPER
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU

SAY IT LOUD, SAY IT PROUD
THERE IS NO BOTTOM TURTLE.

All the darkness in the entire vast multiverse can not defeat the flame of a single candle.

42


DR JM NIPOK